There has to be more.

This is in reference to the Hulk Hogan  and Heather Clem (nee Cole) video.

So where is the tape of Bubba the Love Sponge with his wife? Or with other men?

Bubba the Love Sponge obviously taped this stuff[allegedly]. Or someone did [I hope I can put this in here without getting sued]. It can not be the only one. Someone would have had to test if you can see things. Plus, they had to know it was possible, right? At the correct angle.

So how does that all work?

And where are the test runs? Is that being packaged for video release?

Plus Hulk is going around saying it was a low point in his life. But why? Doesn't he think Heather is hot enough for him? Not young enough? I mean, it was sex. Apparently good sex. They thanked each other. I mean, he doesn't have to beat his chest but at least say you enjoyed it.

Sick of open not being open.

            The ‘news media’ will do anything to try and sell. One thing that is no surprise, they use sex. No just news but everything. The names of shows are the latest ploy: Wife Swap, Pawn Stars. These are obvious play on words and or situations that are sex based. Why? Salaciousness sells.

            News stories like to try and use porn stars to sell their stories. Bill O’Reilly did this a bunch back around 2000 to 2002, when I used to watch him. Actually, it was one way yelling [mostly me yelling at him]. Stories about porn stars on papers. Bree Olson hanging out with Charlie Sheen. Things like that. Why even mention what she does? Does anyone know what the other ‘goddess’ does? Even remember her name? But Salaciousness sells so mention that someone is hanging out with a porn star and it is news. Actually is it is old ‘news’; Charlie Sheen used to hang out with Ginger Lynn as well so it wasn’t the first time Sheen did this.

            Lately, I have seen news stories about famous couples with open marriages. There was an unconfirmed uproar that Jada Pinkett and Will Smith have an open marriage. I never saw any stories that actually confirmed other partners. But that wasn’t the point. Just the insinuation got tongues wagging. Got me to click on it. But, no substance.

            Same has happened with other stories as well. The cover of Essence magazine for July 2006 reeled me in by saying that the main story was the actress Monique, Oscar winner, and her husband have an open marriage and she was going to talk about. In fact, also said it was self-love and open marriage.

            Got me.

            The self-love wasn’t masturbation. It was just about pride. There is nothing wrong with that. But it was salacious way of putting it.

            And the open marriage, not so much. It is the future option to be open. Actually, it is the ability to have sex with someone else and still be married. Ok. So they are forgiving. Or they think they will be. But open. No. That is not open. That is just forgiving, maybe, in the future, if it happens. Maybe. BS.

            Same with Bethanny Frankel and her husband. She has a talk show or something? Anyway, I saw a thing online that she confessed to an open marriage.

            Got me.

            Is it open? No. Each one of them has a celebrity pass or hall pass or whatever you want to call it. He has one female celebrity. She has one male celebrity. Once again, this is just forgiveness.

Now, in her defense, Frankel actually called it what it is. It was another website I won’t mention that tried to make more of it. But why? It was actually just false.

            This was brought up watching a movie Swinging with the Finkels. I will spoil the movie. But what the frak? The title does not fit the movie. This is not the first time Hollywood did or does or will do this, using sex to sell. But Hollywood could actually have sex in it. They choose not to. Why? Why not just have the sex?

            Don’t get me started about 50 Shades. I am so frakkin mad about that. But that is a rant that won’t stop. I am so upset with that but that is for another time.

            Anyway, I am sure there are people who are open. They swing. They have times on, times off. Why is that so taboo? Seriously. People cheat or are monogamous. Some of actually monogamish too. I am sick of hearing it just doesn’t work. Heck, monogamous doesn’t always work either. UGH. Now I am ranting and it is not making sense.

            In the end, if you are going to use sex to sell, actually have some sex in the story.

American Wedding dilemma: Who would you want to be?

          Finchy or The Stiffmeister? I was watching American Wedding [or as it sometimes called, American Pie 3] on HBO the other day. At the end of the movie [spoiler alert] two of the single guys have casual sex. It made me think: Which single guy who hooks up at the wedding would you rather be?

X.  Paul Finch who hooks up with Janine [Stilfer’s Mom]

                                    or

Y. Steve Stifler who hooks up with Cadence Flaherty [Michelle Flaherty’s sister]

           

            Personally I would be Finch. But if anyone ever called me Shit Break, there would be Hell to pay.

            Honestly, I am into lots of different types of women. I would choose a Cougar over a young girl/ woman anytime. Cougars are just more self-assured. More sensual. Overall more erotic and exotic. I enjoy MY time with them more. They appreciate me a lot more. That makes me feel even better. Hopefully they enjoy themselves as well. Actually, I want any and every woman I am with to enjoy themselves.

Honestly this might make me sound like some sort of stud. I am not. But I have some experience. And MY personal experience would lead me to this conclusion.

            What about you?

away too long

Hello to all. I have been away for far too long. My bad.

Doesn't mean I am not still kinky. But mostly I have questions. I have to get them into a full formed thoughts and I will get them out.

See ya soon,
TyRoy

Far too long- and not that

It has been too long since I have posted. No real reason. I should have a ton of times. I let life get in my way.

One thing I have been thinking about is the future of porn. Will there continue to be small companies that compete? If not, the big companies: will they focus on big movies like the two Pirates movies [which I haven't seen]? Will they continue on with real raunchy movies too? Will there be dynamic 'gonzo' personalities like Shane or Seymore Butts who spanned a ton of copy cats? Or something new that utilizes social networking [which I do not do so I have no idea how that would work]?

I don't know but I know one thing:

PORN WILL NOT GO AWAY !!

Sexual Mysteries Part 2

In Episode 6 of Series 2 of the British version of “The Office”, Gareth receives a phone call. He puts it on speaker. It is from a woman named Anne who wants him to come to her home that night. At first, Gareth is not going to go in favor of a night out with the boys to Chasers. At some point in the conversation; Gareth says that he will indeed be coming over but not for an entire evening. Before leaving for a night out with his friends; one of which is Augie. She asks, “Are you going to bring the toys again?” At which point, Gareth picks up the phone and you can barely hear the rest of the conversation. The only thing significant that he does say is, “Yeah, look forward to doing it to you, too.”

Leaving the question, what toys? What did they do? Was it just to her, as he said? He have the toys used on him as well? What wonderful toys does Gareth have to bring?

Sexual Mysteries Part 1

In Richard North Patterson’s Escape the Night, one of the characters is the owner of a large corporation, the antagonist J. J. Englehardt. He is bent on revenge against the Carey family. Specifically, the protagonist Peter Carey. I believe it is because Englehardt’s own father was an insurance man who killed himself after a lawsuit following a policy that went wrong. Englehardt is so focused that he does not want the liabilities of a family or attachments that might take his focus away from his singular pursuit of revenge. He does of course have basic needs. One of which is sexual release. Englehardt hires a secretary particularly for her own predicament. She is a widowed mother who needs her job worse than most. Part of the agreement they have is, she will perform one of three acts every month but only once a month. At some point during the book, she becomes engaged. But Englehardt will not allow her out of their agreement. I am unsure as to why she must continue to work. Or if she does, why there?


Why she didn’t try to find a replacement for these acts at some point? I understand that then, she is just trapping some other woman. But, doesn’t she want her own quality of life? You would think, as the part of a company, she would have heard of another woman who would have participated. Possibly even gladly. Probably for personal gain to move up in the company. But honestly, why would the secretary care? I would think she would just want out. But Englehardt would have been much more savvy than to get trapped, I believe. It was just an interesting thing. But left totally up in the air. I wish I could have known what the three acts were. Maybe someday I will get to ask Richard North Patterson himself.